Language matters—especially in medicine. A recent article from The Conversation argues that the word “hysterectomy” should be retired and replaced with the more anatomically accurate “uterectomy.” At first glance, this might seem like a niche or overly semantic issue. But dig deeper, and it opens up broader questions about how language reflects outdated ideas—and how it can impact real-world understanding and care.
Let’s take a closer look at the argument, what it gets right, and where it might fall short.
The Case Against “Hysterectomy”
The article lays out a compelling history: the term “hysterectomy” is derived from “hysteria,” a discredited psychiatric diagnosis once used exclusively on women. Ancient physicians blamed everything from fainting to anxiety on a “wandering womb.” The supposed cure? Remove the uterus.
Though “hysteria” was finally dropped from medical manuals in 1980, the name “hysterectomy” persists. The article argues that continuing to use a term rooted in sexist pseudoscience perpetuates misogyny and confuses patients—many of whom incorrectly think it refers to the removal of the ovaries, not just the uterus.
It proposes a more accurate and empowering alternative: “uterectomy,” with optional extensions like “cervicectomy” or “salpingectomy” to specify which organs are removed.
What the Article Gets Right
-
The History Is Important
The origin of “hysterectomy” is undeniably linked to outdated and harmful ideas about women’s health. That history deserves to be acknowledged—and reexamined. -
Language Shapes Understanding
Medical jargon isn’t just for doctors; it influences how patients understand their own bodies. Clearer, anatomy-based language could genuinely help people make more informed decisions. -
It’s Part of a Bigger Picture
The call to rethink “hysterectomy” ties into a broader movement: challenging the male-dominated roots of medical language. From Fallopian tubes to the Pouch of Douglas, many terms reflect the names of men, not anatomy.
But There Are Some Gaps
While the article raises vital points, it doesn’t fully tackle the complexities of changing medical language:
-
Change Takes Time—and Cooperation
Swapping out medical terms isn’t as simple as updating a dictionary. It involves rewriting textbooks, retraining professionals, revising health records, and more. The article doesn’t acknowledge how slowly institutional change happens—or the potential confusion during a transition period. -
What About the Rest of the World?
The article focuses on English-language terms and Australian data. But what about how hysterectomy is framed in other languages or healthcare systems? A more global perspective would make the argument stronger. -
We Need More Data
It cites an unpublished survey showing people misunderstand what “hysterectomy” means—but doesn’t offer peer-reviewed evidence that renaming the procedure would improve outcomes or understanding. Anecdotal support isn’t enough for such a sweeping recommendation. -
It’s a Bit Emotionally Charged
Calling the term “hysterectomy” misogynistic isn’t wrong, but the language may alienate some readers—especially clinicians who use the term routinely and without malicious intent. Tone matters if the goal is to bring people along with the change. -
What About Medical Naming Conventions?
The proposal for “uterectomy” sounds logical, but it doesn’t address how such terms are typically created. There’s a whole system of Latin and Greek roots used in medicine for a reason—and any new term would need to fit that structure.
Final Thoughts: A Worthy Conversation, But Just the Beginning
There’s no question that medical language needs to evolve. It should be inclusive, accurate, and empowering. The article is a thoughtful and much-needed contribution to that conversation.
But rethinking a term like “hysterectomy” requires more than just good intentions. It demands research, collaboration, and a plan for implementation across the healthcare ecosystem.
In short: it’s a great starting point. But for real change to happen, we need a roadmap—and a broader, more nuanced discussion that includes linguists, clinicians, educators, and, most importantly, patients.
What do you think—should “hysterectomy” be replaced? Would a new name make the procedure clearer or more respectful?